What I am Doing

Click here to reach me>>: CONTACT ME

"Corruption unchallenged is corruption sanctioned"

Here are some of the things I have done while this has been going on. Not things your typical "bad cop" does, wouldn't you agree? I took an oath, and while others broke theirs, I belive I am still bound by mine.

December 15, 2003: I chased down armed robbers (one with a semiauto pistol, one with an assault rifle) from delivery stop (7-11). I forced them to run AWAY from the waiting get-away car which resulted in K-9 capturing one, which then led to the capture of all three. They had been involved in a string or armed robberies.

January 2004: I caught shoplifter in Mt. Holly 7-11 who then became aggressive towards the clerk. He was turned over to a County Sheriff outside who was in patrol car while this was going on, chatting on cell phone.

 April 10, 2004:  I forced a reckless driver pull over. The female driver was drunk so bad that she was all over BOTH lanes. She could barely walk. I drove her home. She called the next day to thank me, to let me know she just buried her husband and never drank, and was appreciative for a second chance at life.

"Frankly, I have had more than enough of judicial opinions that bear no relationship whatsoever to the cases that have been filed and argued before the judges. I am talking about judicial opinions that falsify the facts of the cases that have been argued, judicial opinions that make disingenuous use or omission of material authorities, judicial opinions that cover up these things with no-publication and no-citation rules."

M. Freedman, Professor of Law and Distinguished Legal Scholar 
 

Update on habeas corpus petition in the Federal Court:


Here is the Judge's "decision." I find it beyond coincidence that this Judge let this sit for seven months and even after three letters asking him to accelerate it or to move on it, he does nothing UNTIL I send a letter copy to him advising that I was asking Judge Wolfson to assume jurisdiction over this matter to since it would make sense in the Motion for Grand Jury access. What is exceptionally interesting is that Judge Kugler, not unlike the NJ Courts disturbingly, clearly makes a decision that has absolutely no legal basis. I am not making this up because it’s a negative decision; its simply so as you will see in my letter sent back to Judge Kugler asking him to reconsider. But unless he gets permission from whoever ordered him to make this obstruction to justice, I anticipate an appeal will be required. Link to decision:  http://southjerseyjustice.com/Kuglerdecision.doc

In my letter of reconsideration, I don't pull any punches. Frankly I am getting tired of the failure of even an attempt to be creative in the falseness. Link to response letter:
http://southjerseyjustice.com/reconsideration.doc

I have now filed an appeal with the Court of Appeals. I guess its time to test their integrity. It will be interesting to see if the writings on their Federal building "Guardians of Justice" plays true or false. Here is the brief I filed in support of my appeal of Judge Kugler's denial of habeas corpus relating back to the illegal conviction:

http://southjerseyjustice.com/courtofappeal.doc

As I stated earlier, I filed a Complaint in the US District Court to enforce my statutory right to appear before a Federal Grand Jury to present evidence of Federal crimes.

"The constitution, on this hypothesis, is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please. It should be remembered, as an axiom of eternal truth in politics, that whatever power in any government is independent, is absolute also; in theory only, at first, while the spirit of the people is up, but in practice, as fast as that relaxes. Independence can be trusted nowhere but with the people in mass. They are inherently independent of all but moral law."

~ Thomas Jefferson, letter to Judge Spencer Roane, September 6, 1819. "The Writings of Thomas Jefferson," edited by Andrew A. Lipscomb, vol. 15, p. 213 (1904).

 
http://southjerseyjustice.com/GJBrief.doc

Here I am delivering the Motion, trying to start a solution to the problem:


Judge Wolfson's decision came immediately after Judge Kugler's. I guess when I started talking about consolidating, it lit a spark under those black robes! At least Judge Wolfson's decision was still in the same ballpark, unlike Kugler's. Wolfson decided against me, and against every victim like me who cannot find justice. Apparently Wolfson understands that Judges, while immune from civil liability for any action they may take as a judge, are NOT immune from crimes that they may commit, or participate in with others....like I don't know...maybe upholding unlawful convictions?

It seems that after a quick behind-the-scenes conference call, Judges Wolfson and Kugler and company decided it was time to squash my pursuit of justice. At least now I know why they call them "opinions" and not a factual determination. Here is the opinion:

http://southjerseyjustice.com/GJWolfsonopinion.doc

Here are just some points to think about regarding this. One: Why is there not one reference to any of the important cases that were submitted in my argument? Two: Why did Judge Wolfson skip over the *Statue 3332 part wherein I asked her to present the charges to a Grand Jury? Three: So kidnapping, falsifying search warrant affadavits to gain entry into homes to steal evidence that incriminates the State's main witness, ignoring court orders, multiple false arrests of several victims, is not "extrodinary" justification for the Court to order the US Attorney to do their job and present the charges to a Grand Jury at least? Why the obstruction? Why the threat to public safety? For what and for whom more importantly, for how much? I knew a letter of reconsideration on this one wasn't even worth my time. But I did want to let her know that I was not letting her off the hook immediately. Here is my follow up letter to Judge Wolfson asking if she intends to comply with the obligation imposed upon her by one of the very statues cited in my legal brief:

http://southjerseyjustice.com/Wolfsonfollowup.doc

*  "The power to empanel a Special Grand Jury also, and independendently lies with the Court:

§ 3332. Powers and duties

(a) It shall be the duty of each such grand jury impaneled within any judicial district to inquire into offenses against the criminal laws of the United States alleged to have been committed within that district. Such alleged offenses may be brought to the attention of the grand jury by the court [emphasis added] or by any attorney appearing on behalf of the United States for the presentation of evidence. Any such attorney receiving information concerning such an alleged offense from any other person shall, if requested by such other person, inform the grand jury of such alleged offense, the identity of such other person, and such attorney’s action or recommendation.
(b) Whenever the district court determines that the volume of business of the special grand jury exceeds the capacity of the grand jury to discharge its obligations, the district court may order an additional special grand jury for that district to be impaneled. [emphasis added]"

As of 4.7.06: Judge Wolfson has not deigned to reply. I have filed a notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals as I did with Judge Kugler's decision. As the appeal to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has been accepted and docketed. I await further notice from the Third Circuit, Court of Appeals.

Here is what was presented to the Court of Appeals:

http://southjerseyjustice.com/CourtofAppealsBrief.doc

This Court has agreed to accept, file, and present to these same Judges my Motion to Accellerate:

http://southjerseyjustice.com/CourtofAppealsAccellerationrequest.doc

Click here to reach me>>: CONTACT ME