Domestic Violence III

Click here to reach me>>: CONTACT ME

January 1999: Either accidentally or by design I discovered that two of my rival sergeants, Reed and VanSciver (both who had shaky chances at best of being promoted further) had joined together to initiate yet another internal affairs "investigation" against me. It didn't matter that a Federal civil suit had been started against Reed for falsifying the drunk driving internal affairs investigation! Indeed, he needed to end that suit any way possible, even if it meant committing more crime! This latest attack purported that a fellow officer and friend of mine from my department had told Sergeant VanSciver that Kozub had approached him while they were in computer class and voiced accusations of domestic acts from me towards her. Special Report:

This report by VanSciver was proven false, not by me, but by Gerrow's  own investigator's! Look at what Detective Lietenberger personally revealed as to the validity of this "special report" as completed by Sergeant VanSciver when she was interviewing Officer Ingling. First, concerning Sgt. VanSciver's motive:

Lietenberger:   So you don't feel as a Sgt. with information that he [SGT. VANSCIVER] get, that you give him, he doesn't have a responsibility or a duty to do what he feels is appropriate with it?
Officer Ingling: Oh I certainly feel that he would have a responsibility or duty if he felt that there was a problem.
Lietenberger:   Sure
Officer Ingling: But I, I, feel that it was, feelings I mean ,  it's because of who it was not because he felt truly concerned about it.

Lietenberger:   And why do you feel that?
Officer Ingling: Because of personality conflicts
Lietenberger:  So you're saying that it's your perception, your own personal belief that the only reason he passed this information on to SGT. REED is because it's SGT. BARANOSKI?
Officer Ingling:  I believe so, yes.  Because I don't believe that anything that was said would give a reasonable person any cause to be concerned.

Then concerning the accuracy of the statements made by VanSciver:

Lietenberger: Um in this special report um SGT VANSCIVER um relates that um you informed him that you had been in computer school with DEANNA and you had said?
Officer Ingling:  That's not correct. I can't really say why he would put that.  But I had never gone to a computer class with her.
Lietenberger:   Um she went on to say to you that on one occasion she was assigned to work the book because she was so upset with something that had transpired between her and DALE?
Officer Ingling:   Again I, I heard that rumor but I don't believe that she said that to me directly. .. I don't recall her saying that to me directly and I don't believe that I would have communicated it that way.

Upon discovering the internal affairs report alleging domestic accusations against me I knew decisive action was needed. To add to this my brother had informed me that Kozub had issued him a parking ticket! This disregard of professional courtesy was a clear indication that Kozub was over the edge and on a warpath. He didn't want to tell me at first but after we talked about how deranged Kozub was becoming, he knew I was going to have to take legal action of some sort and wanted me to know what she had done. Ticket:

Note: Kozub had told my brother that she "didn't recognize the name." Considering she knew him for as long as she had dated me, and that her son and his played together, this was a poor lie.

Since I truly had no reason to disbelieve the accuracy of the contents of the special report as completed by Sergeant VanSciver, I knew the time had come to send a cease and desist letter to Kozub. This is the same action that victims of harassment had been advised by myself (and all police officers) to do in the event that more serious action was needed. It let her finally know that I was aware of her depraved sexual solicitation towards my friends. It was also a letter to provide closure from the hold that domestic violence abusers are able to establish. A hold which I never thought would apply to me! However, despite all she had done there was an acknowledgement that I believed her problems needed to be addressed by a professional, and that I really didn't want to have to take the matter any further, such as telling her police administration. Besides, even as the domestic violence victim, I too would have my weapons seized, even my duty weapon, which would mean I would be out of work. Another reason was that during our 2 1/2 year relationship, it was inevitable that I became attached to her son and did not want any possible publicity of his mother's actions to become public and cause such media attention to harm him in any way. It was indeed the least intrusive way;

Deanna,

   Someone (anonymous) recently forwarded to me official documentation from my Department with some very disturbing information.  It is dated November 30, 1998 and is the initial basis for the beginning of the IA against me of which you wanted to give me a "heads up." It confirms you as the instigator. It infuriated me so that I almost accepted the advice to go directly to your Administration and formally request relief from you and your behavior.  However, I decided to wait a few days, and wait till I cooled off to make a final decision.  Right or wrong, and against others judgements because they think I am wasting my time, I have decided to write you this letter in hopes of getting you to stop what you are doing.  I think that if I agreed and went to your Administration, that ultimately there is the possibility that Tommy [her son] could be affected by what he may hear inadvertently, or by what may happen to you.  Even though you attempted to have that happen to me, I do not want that. There is another reason, but I have no desire to divulge it here, nor would you believe it anyway.
   If there is any good left in you, I hope you will allow it to pay close attention because if you don't stop what you are doing, I will have to go to the next level and report you to your Department.  I will have to show them the document detailing how you have been approaching people and slandering me, making allegations that I am, and continue to, harass you.  How most recently (November/98) you confronted Officer Ingling while in computer class with him, full well knowing we were not on friendly terms, and telling him that you were having problems with me "harassing" you [now known to have been a false statement in the IA by VanSciver], that I caused you to be so upset that you had to "work the desk."  That you could have had me arrested, etc. That you never reported it for fear of having your weapon taken away. (Ironic note: Remember at my house Deanna, after you attacked me, when you looked me in the eye and asked me if I was going to call the cops, knowing that I couldn't for just that reason?) That I purposely come over on P-1 so that you hear my voice. 
   Deanna, because of you and your continuos allegations, I have been forced to go the long way to Chuck's house so that you can't allege that I am "stalking" you as you have been repeatedly telling people. 
   I had previously asked Sgt. Maver to ask you to stop doing this, and I even verbally told you myself when we spoke in October. We both knew you were doing it even though you attempted to deny it. This documentation I now have only confirms your actions. Of course, it doesn't explain why you did it. There is no rational explanation, which leaves me concerned that there is only an irrational one. 
   Deanna, I will, and always have, had no reservation admitting that I may have had a short-term problem, mainly related to work, but which may have affected you and me [re; drunk driving incident]. That however was long since resolved. However, you have some serious long-term ones that are going to cause some major problems if you don't get help.  You have done some terrible things without rhyme or reason. By all rights, I shouldn't care and should simply turn over the document to your Administration, but simply because I worry that it may somehow affect Tommy, I won't, UNLESS you do not stop.  I have enough problems of my own Deanna without having to wonder what you are going to do next.
   I feel sorry for you Deanna, because there really is no reason for your actions.  For whatever reason, you elected to hate me, even though you have no basis to do so. If I had to make a guess on my own, I would have to say that in reality, you hate yourself, and blame me for what you feel and how you feel about yourself. No one cares about me or you or why we broke up.  Your running around telling wild accusations only makes you look worse.  I have been told so.  Your reputation is bad only by your own actions, no one else. Stop blaming other people for things that are your responsibility.  It is your uncontrollable desire to be noticed by men, married/attached/or single, that often is the cause of your problems. That and not keeping your mouth quiet, as is exemplified by the need for this letter.
   Also, in spite of the anger I feel by what you have been doing, I also feel sorry for you because you I can still say that you are an attractive and strong woman Deanna, who doesn’t realize the strength she actually has. I truly hope that you find the strength to admit you have some problems and the resolve to seek help. You never had a need to be seen by everyone as the "victim" Deanna. You and I both know that you can hide it, but I think if you don't get help, you and everyone around you will suffer for it.  I know I am already.
Deanna, by opening this letter, you have caused to be generated a receipt confirmation notice that I will now have, confirming that you received this letter.  If I hear one more word about your false allegations, or any attempt to slander me, I will be forced to go to your Administration. This also includes paging me with ex-girlfriends numbers. By your words and actions you have guaranteed that we will never be friends, or even friendly. I will not, and cannot, forget the maliciousness you have done to me. Forgiveness is not mentioned because I truly do not think you can control yourself. I truly and honestly just want to be left alone Deanna. We both have the right to be able to go on with our lives . . . let's do it ok? Let it go. I have.

   I am requesting that you have no more contact with me Deanna.  I will grant only one condition when you may do so . . . Only if you need help getting or going to professional assistance.

   And on my badge, this letter is only between you and me. What you do or who you choose to show it to is on you.

Dale
January 27,1999

Now, firstly, this email was not and could not ever, in any way be considered "threatening" nor does it "threaten to ruin plaintiff's career" as claimed on the Temporary Restraining Order Kozub got against me (see below).

Of course there are those that may say, ok, we give you this, but this is only one problem with the report right? (aside from it being hidden). The answer is NO. The report given was 7 pages long, and the one withheld was 9 pages long. This means information on the public IA report was removed from the hidden one!

After sending the cease and desist letter, it apparently gave Kozub the unanticipated push to speed her over the edge. Apparently no one tells Kozub to stay away and not be the victim! Here is where the real criminality of the story begins. Sgt. Reed, using the concocted Special Report as a basis, had contacted Det./Sgt. Richardson from Kozub's PD to follow up, hoping that something would pan out. Remember, his advancement as well as the civil suit against him was pending:

"Monday 30, 1998 I called and talked to D/Sgt. Timothy Richardson of the Bur1ington Township Police Department. Richardson is Burlington Townships Internal Affairs Officer. D/Sgt. Richardson advised me he would contact Deanna and see what she wanted to do and he would get back to me.


Sincerely,
D/Sgt. B. Reed
Operations Officer"

When questioned by Richardson, Kozub's internal affairs officer, Kozub denied the existence of any domestic related problems. This official statement and report would never be provided by Gerrow. This is very important because it impeached Kozub for when she later claimed that now there was a domestic violence act. Regardless, and as a result of Kozub's denial of any problems, Reed was forced to close the matter, all without me having known about it at the time:

 

So as of December 1998, Kozub had officially denied any allegations of domestic problems.

So strong were the denials that when questioned during depsotions for the then-pending lawsuit, Chief Harper concurred the internal was closed and UNFOUNDED! Click the link below to see for yourself:

http://southjerseyjustice.com.previewyoursite.com/harperdepoia.JPG

To this day, the official records, even though requested, subpoenaed and ordered by the court, have never been produced, as if by saying since it can't be seen, it can be denied. I doubt such a position will hold up in the new civil complaint I am preparing in light of all this factual support and proof.

Kozub had also told Sgt. Taylor, a close friend of mine, of the investigation into domestic allegations between her and I also, as well as her denial of any to her Internal Affairs. This was the excuse she used to try to sexually solicit him as described on the previous page. It was only because of this that I knew of the first statement and the denial. Sgt. Taylor told this to County Detective Lietenberger when she was questioning him. Of course, this had no effect upon Lietenberger. Why should it, it is only a major FUPA! 

Lietenberger: Did KOZUB ever tell you that she denied domestic misconduct between her and DALE?
Sgt. Taylor: I think it was December.   Came over and she said that she got word that DALE’S department was doing an Internal investigation on him reference incidents that happened between him and her.
Lietenberger: Uhum...
Sgt. Taylor: And she wanted him to be aware of it but didn't want to have contact with him. Didn’t think they had that kind of relationship that she could do that.   But thought that I could give him the word so he's aware of it.   As you aware he's had problems with his department recently.  So I said fine you know I'll, I'll let him know.   And I did.   Basically, she gave me the scenario how she found out to that.   I think that her, an investigator from her department came to her and told her that their detective contacted him reference to some  incident and he was running it down. And she said that there's nothing to run down or there was nothing to (inaudible)    That's basically what, what her end of it was.  Um and that's, that's what I think you called me here for.

So, only after reading my cease and desist letter, suddenly there were domestic acts?

On or about February 7, 1999, immediately after receiving the cease and desist letter, Kozub went to her internal affairs officer, the same one she denied any wrongdoing to originally in December/November of 1998 and cried wolf, claiming that the lawful letter from me was "threatening." Also, the incident where she was caught in the sexual liaison with Officer Lazarrotti, Jr. was now being alleged by her to have been an illegal act as a trespass!

Now, without any mention by Richardson of the illegality of Kozub now providing a contradictory statement from the official one she gave him just two months prior, Richardson shepherded the "victim" Kozub to the County Prosecutors Office where she was received with open arms. Perhaps now it should be noted that the Kozub's father, George Kozub, was and still is a politician in Burlington Township. Mr. Kozub was also Richardson's "boss" ultimately. Worse, the former Public Safety Director (de facto Chief of Police) Walt Corter was now Chief of Detectives for the Burlington County Prosecutor's Office! I say was, because he has retired from that cushy position and returned to his former position as Public Safety Director for Burlington Township! I don't think this has ever happened in NJ before. Apparently his role now is to ride rein on those Officers who might speak out against what was happening. See, even officers from Burlington Township were not pleased with what was going on and would need to kept quiet, as the previous Public Safety Director (Lloyd Nippins, father of the infamous Anthony Nippins described on the other victims page of this site) did. The ground could not have been more fertile for more corruption.

February 8, 1999: Kozub was taken before a Family Court Judge, claiming that she was "fearful" by the contents of the cease and desist letter, and citing the 8 month old incident at her house, now claimed to have been an illegal entry. The Judge granted her an "EMERGENCY" temporary restraining order (TRO) despite her allegation being eight months old! The Domestic Violence Retraining Order was issued against me even in the absence of any court determination that I had committed any Domestic Violence. To be sure, there was no showing or finding that there was any previous history of violence between us including previous threats, harassment and physical abuse by me towards Kozub, which is needed to get a TRO. Note: A review of the court tape showed Kozub was treated with respect and courtesy by Judge Bell, JSC. (You can get a video and/or audiocopy at the County for $10). Yet the complete opposite occurs when I go before the same Judge the very next day!

I was paged out by my lieutenant and asked to respond to the Police Station. I already knew why as my brother had paged me and told me that our local police had come to his house and seized all HIS weapons too because I used to live there. Upon arrival at the station, I was escorted to my home in Mt. Laurel, NJ and forced to hand over all my weapons, including my duty weapon. I was informed that not only was a I to be barred from the police station like a criminal, I was to be suspended without pay and without written charges and a hearing which was in violation of N.J.S.A. 40A: 14-147 and N.J.S.A. 40A: 14-149. But this was old hat to Chief Harper, suspending me without pay.  This was also done to impair my Federal lawsuit as well as inflict harm by taking away my income. Remember, Harper was named in that suit!

Later that night, knowing that I no longer needed to keep secret the assault by Kozub and fully realizing that Kozub was out of control and more of a threat than ever, I went to my local police department and signed a criminal complaint against her:

***Assault Complaint***

Despite having overwhelming evidence, statements, witness and even Kozub's own admission that the attack had occurred, the criminal complaint against Kozub was dismissed by Gerrow and company "for lack of evidence." Click here -  ADMINISTRATIVE DISMISSAL

When you have a victim, an eyewitness, and police officers confirming the incident and the injuries, and even an admission from the accused, lack of evidence is the one thing you can't claim. This dismissal was done to make Kozub look innocent and to tilt the legal field in her favor. Later analysis would reveal this to be a common thread with all the other real victims as well. 

The next day, after receiving a threatening phone call from Kozub "to watch my back," I obtained a temporary restraining order against her. I went before the same Judge (Judge Bell, JSC). A comparison of the taped proceedings showed a completely different attitude by the Judge. Even though my complaint and basis for the restraining order was for physical abuse, I was criticized and made to almost grovel to get the restraint!:

****  http://southjerseyjustice.com.previewyoursite.com/dalestro.doc  ****


In addition to the TRO, the State and County police policies that governs what happens to police officers involved in domestic violence situations, whether as an accused or a victim, states that the officer's weapons are to be seized and not returned until he or she has been evaluated as fit for duty. These policies have the same effect and force as if they were law:  (Directive of the Attorney General Implementing Procedures for the Seizure of Weapons from Law Enforcement Officers involved in Domestic Violence Incidents issued August 1995 AND the Burlington County Prosecutor’s Office Operational Directive 93-2 (revised February 1996)). Both mandates were ignored and violated by Gerrow and the Burlington Township Police Department. No seizure of Kozub's weapons ever occurred. Section VID of the Burlington County's policy demanded that a psychological evaluation be conducted upon Kozub.  To the best of my knowledge and to date, none has ever been conducted upon Kozub. Kozub always remained on active, unrestricted duty with pay. Conversely, I voluntarily submitted and successfully passed such an examination. Dr. Klugman personally advised me that I was determined fit to return to work, as did his final report. Dr. Klugman then called the Burlington Township Police Department to inquire when he could expect to evaluate Kozub. He was told he wouldn't! Gerrow not only blocked the restraining order and the criminal complaints that Kozub admitted to, he even blocked his Office's own guidelines! By now, I was uncovering serious corruption! All this was presented to the AG's Office without results except to cover it up. All this was relayed to my legal counsel. Now, to show how shoddy this organized crime ring was, take a look at page one of the first Internal Affairs report as completed by County Detective Lietenberger: INTERNAL AFFAIRS1 

Now take a look at page one of the SECOND Internal Affairs report she did, which is the one she sent out, while hiding the other one: INTERNAL AFFAIRS2

Look at the very first sentence. They are different. See, the first one made the "threatening" status of the email to be in question, while the second takes away any doubt that the email was "threatening." Legally, its a big deal and its proof that the rest of the reports are inconsistent with each other. Since you have seen the actual email (above) it is obviously in no way "threatening!" But is that all you may ask? No, the report Gerrow releases to my lawyer first is SEVEN pages long, while the original, hidden report is NINE pages long...so at least over two pages of information were hidden. The only reason I discovered the original IA report was because they sent one to one lawyer (Charles Nugent, Jr.)  and the other to a second lawyer I had (Mario Apuzzo, Esq.). When I reviewed the second lawyers file that he had to give me (upon being fired), I noticed the differences. This was included in the appeal yet the Judges had no problem with this illegal activity.

Lawyers pay attention: Conduct Case File Inspections!

As mentioned prior, Assistant Prosecutor Kathy Toncyzcyzn was told by my first Attorney Rob Liener, Esq. that I had in my possession a phone message recording of Kozub admitting to the assault and admitting that she was wrong for what she did. Lietenberger was able to get a Judge to sign a search warrant for my home by falsifying the search warrant affidavit that the Judge relied on in deciding whether to approve it or not. As a result, I would then became the victim of a burglary and a theft. Although there are several glaring examples to show the falsity of Lietenberger's "sworn" affidavit, the easiest to demonstrate is how she inserted a highly inflammatory remark that was made up at her instigation by Sgt. Maver (Kozub's friend, sometime lover as newly discovered, and co-worker). Take a look at Maver's conflicting statements on the next page. I guess the promise of being promoted from sergeant to lieutenant was the trade for any integrity he may have had left.

The claim for the search warrant was to seize my computer for "evidence" relating to the emailed cease and desist letter. The real purpose was to get the tape recording admission made by Kozub. There was no mention at all on the search warrant for the tape. But when my home was invaded on February 22, 1999 by Lietenberger and her lackeys, they went through every nook and cranny of my home. Now, when a real search warrant is executed, they can only look in places described on the search warrant and only those places where such items can be expected to be found. For example, if you are looking for a rifle, you can't reasonably expect to find it in a small drawer. This search warrant was for my computer and such related equipment, which was all contained in one room far away from the rest of the house. However, they went into my bedroom and guess what they took out of a small bedroom drawer? Yep, the tape recording admission made by Kozub! Wait till you see the crimes that flowed from this theft. This tape, aside from not being on the search warrant nor was it evidence of a crime, was also exculpatory evidence. That means it benefited me and not the accused. See, an admission of a domestic assault that also included an admission that it was "wrong" was very helpful to me, and hurtful to Kozub, and it was very important for Gerrow to remove it from my possession, lest I use it in Court! Also, remember, Gerrow said the assault by Kozub at my house never happened so he needed to remove evidence that it did! Interestingly, what was not found during the search was anything incriminating; nothing on the computer, no pictures or love letters, nada!

Taped message regarding the assault by Kozub:

KOZUB: I was wrong for coming over your house, but big deal. That was eight, six months ago, whatever it was.

By the beginning of March, there was a criminal complaint and a restraining order against Kozub, and counter complaint and Kozub's TRO against me. However, to show how the Prosecutors Office had already determined that only I, the real domestic violence victim, was going to be solely targeted, can be seen in the BCPO press release. This even though they KNEW Kozub gave contradicting statements (from no domestic at all as she had told IA Officer Richardson to domestic acts now existing). And her "alibi" of having been out with a coworker Britzinghoffer which was proved false as Britzinghoffer was in Florida! The news release was also designed as a propaganda tool to make it appear that only I was engaged in committing domestic violence against the "victim" Kozub! Here is the actual news release: BCPO press release

Click here to reach me>>: CONTACT ME